BFJA vs. BFOC
BFJA (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January) and BFOC (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.90% expense ratio.
Performance
BFJA vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BFJA
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- 6M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BFOC
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $278.70 | $434.88 | $1.70K | |
| $37.66K | $47.54K | $63.36K |
BFJA vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January | -13.87% |
BFOC FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October | -7.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFJA and BFOC is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFJA vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFJA vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum BFOC drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and BFOC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFJA | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.74% | -18.41% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.93% | -17.69% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -13.54% | +2.97% |
Volatility
BFJA vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFJA | BFOC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 11.66% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 11.66% | +2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 11.66% | +2.20% |
BFJA vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BFJA and BFOC have an expense ratio of 0.90%.
Dividends
BFJA vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFJA nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFJA and BFOC have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.90% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFJA and BFOC have the same expense ratio: 0.90% per year.
BFJA and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for BFJA and BFOC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer