PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFIX vs. NUAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BFIX vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BFIX vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
0.82%5.91%12.95%4.97%-6.82%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
-0.03%7.37%2.02%7.52%-10.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFIX achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly higher than NUAG's -0.03% return.


BFIX

1D
-0.42%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.59%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
7.60%
5Y*
10Y*

NUAG

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-0.03%
6M
0.67%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BFIX vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BFIX vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFIX
BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

NUAG
NUAG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NUAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NUAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFIX vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFIXNUAGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

1.02

+0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

1.45

+0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.19

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

1.90

+2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.51

5.51

+5.00

BFIX vs. NUAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the NUAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFIX and NUAG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFIXNUAGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.02

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.30

+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between BFIX and NUAG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BFIX vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison

BFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, less than NUAG's 4.54% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
3.59%3.73%4.38%4.30%1.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUAG
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.54%4.43%4.44%3.95%3.60%2.27%2.93%3.54%3.79%3.38%0.48%

Drawdowns

BFIX vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum NUAG drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFIX and NUAG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BFIXNUAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-19.79%

+11.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-2.54%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.75%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.85%

-5.01%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.88%

-0.42%

Volatility

BFIX vs. NUAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) is 0.73%, while Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that BFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BFIXNUAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.66%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

2.44%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07%

4.28%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.84%

6.00%

-1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.84%

5.51%

-0.67%