BFIX vs. CRUX
BFIX (Build Bond Innovation ETF) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFIX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
BFIX vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BFIX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 3.71%
- 3Y*
- 7.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFIX vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF | -0.35% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFIX and CRUX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFIX vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
BFIX
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BFIX vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFIX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFIX vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFIX drawdown since its inception was -8.54%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFIX and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFIX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.54% | -1.85% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.50% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.99% | -0.60% | -2.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | — | — |
Volatility
BFIX vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFIX | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86% | 4.10% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 4.10% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.76% | 4.10% | +0.66% |
BFIX vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFIX vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
BFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFIX Build Bond Innovation ETF | 3.55% | 3.73% | 4.38% | 4.30% | 1.58% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFIX and CRUX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BFIX.
BFIX has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Build and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for BFIX and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for BFIX and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer