PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFFAX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFFAX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFFAX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.34% return.


BFFAX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.02%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.18%
1Y
4.47%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-0.03%
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.39%
1M
4.62%
YTD
11.34%
6M
11.27%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
22.68%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFFAX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFFAX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3
-0.02%7.54%1.54%4.39%-13.00%-0.97%11.12%8.17%0.22%3.07%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.34%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%19.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BFFAX and VOO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.00

Over the past year, BFFAX and VOO have become more correlated (0.26) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFFAX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFFAX
BFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
BFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
BFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFFAX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFFAXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.44

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.23

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

15.03

-10.07

BFFAX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFFAX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFFAXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

2.44

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.84

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.89

-0.46

Drawdowns

BFFAX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFFAX drawdown since its inception was -17.74%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFFAX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFFAXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.74%

-33.99%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-8.90%

+5.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.10%

-18.69%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.74%

-24.52%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.32%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.69%

-3.69%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

1.91%

-0.88%

Volatility

BFFAX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3 (BFFAX) is 1.38%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that BFFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFFAXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

2.78%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.83%

8.90%

-6.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

11.80%

-7.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

16.81%

-10.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.99%

18.00%

-13.01%

BFFAX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFFAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BFFAX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

BFFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFFAX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America Class F-3
4.51%4.48%4.67%3.28%2.46%1.98%5.38%3.80%2.72%2.01%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFFAX and VOO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to BFFAX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFFAX dropped -17.74% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFFAX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer