BFEB vs. QDTE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and QDTE (Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while QDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. BFEB is passively managed, while QDTE is actively managed. Over the past year, BFEB returned 19.04% vs 33.64% for QDTE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for QDTE.

Performance

BFEB vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 12.61% return.

BFEB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

QDTE

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 11.52%
• 1Y: 33.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	7.13%	12.99%	11.35%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	12.61%	19.32%	17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and QDTE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024	0.87

The correlation between BFEB and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFEB vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 77
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

QDTE

QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 64
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 62
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFEB	QDTE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.03	+0.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.58	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	3.31	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	12.82	+2.11

BFEB vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFEB and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than QDTE's maximum drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and QDTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFEB	QDTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-22.86%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-10.20%	+3.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-3.55%	+2.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-3.13%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	2.63%	-1.35%

Volatility

BFEB vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 2.70%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFEB	QDTE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	8.57%	-5.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	13.32%	-6.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.34%	16.68%	-8.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	18.99%	-7.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	18.99%	-4.74%

BFEB vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFEB vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.23%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.23%	49.49%	32.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFEB and QDTE in my portfolio?

BFEB and QDTE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFEB or QDTE?

QDTE has higher volatility (8.57%) compared to BFEB (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -27.20% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

Which ETF is better, BFEB or QDTE?

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 33.64% vs 19.04% for BFEB. On fees, BFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFEB or QDTE?

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 33.64% return vs 19.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFEB or QDTE?

BFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFEB or QDTE?

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.23%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

What is the main difference between BFEB and QDTE?

BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.97% for QDTE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.