BFAP vs. ROBT
BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while ROBT is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. BFAP is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -29.14% vs 16.58% for ROBT. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
BFAP vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 12.63% return.
BFAP
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- -13.09%
- YTD
- -21.35%
- 1Y
- -29.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -10.97%
ROBT
- 1D
- 3.72%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $15.29K | $11.99K | $25.71K | |
| $3.00M | $2.38M | $2.94M |
BFAP vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | -21.35% | 8.90% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 12.63% | 33.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAP and ROBT is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAP vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
BFAP
ROBT
BFAP vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFAP | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.12 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 0.77 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 2.00 | -3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFAP vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAP | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.15% | -44.47% | +10.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.15% | -21.66% | -12.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.65% | -3.09% | -28.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -15.82% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.36% | 8.30% | +13.06% |
Volatility
BFAP vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 3.75%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAP | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 7.06% | -3.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.78% | 19.69% | -5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.57% | 25.22% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 25.64% | -5.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 25.56% | -5.58% |
BFAP vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFAP vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.12%, more than ROBT's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | 24.12% | 18.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAP and ROBT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (7.06%) compared to BFAP (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -34.15% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 1-year performance, ROBT leads with 16.58% vs -29.14% for BFAP. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ROBT has performed better with a 16.58% return vs -29.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.
BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.12%, compared with 0.02% for ROBT.
BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ROBT is Artificial Intelligence. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.65% for ROBT.
ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFAP and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer