BFAP vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFAP is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. BFAP is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -24.44% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

BFAP vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -20.89% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.

BFAP

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: -7.01%
• YTD: -20.89%
• 6M: -23.66%
• 1Y: -24.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 2.70%
• 6M: 2.79%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAP vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-20.89%	8.90%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.70%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and RBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 98
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAP vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BFAP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.15	5.01	-6.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.58	7.92	-9.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	2.39	-1.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	17.00	-17.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	70.66	-72.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BFAP vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 5.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFAP	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.15	5.01	-6.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.59	4.28	-4.87

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -31.25%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.25%	-0.50%	-30.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.25%	-0.27%	-30.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.25%	0.00%	-31.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-0.06%	-10.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.89%	0.07%	+16.82%

Volatility

BFAP vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that BFAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	0.30%	+3.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.66%	0.79%	+16.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.26%	0.92%	+20.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	1.05%	+19.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	1.05%	+19.52%

BFAP vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.98%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	23.98%	18.97%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.60%	3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and RBIL in my portfolio?

BFAP and RBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFAP or RBIL?

BFAP has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -31.25% vs RBIL's -0.50%.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.57% vs -24.44% for BFAP. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFAP or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or RBIL?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 23.98%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.

What is the main difference between BFAP and RBIL?

BFAP is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.