BFAP vs. EZPZ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BFAP (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BFAP is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BFAP returned -29.14% vs -46.61% for EZPZ. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BFAP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAP achieves a -21.35% return, which is significantly higher than EZPZ's -29.45% return.

BFAP

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 1.78%
• 6M: -13.09%
• YTD: -21.35%
• 1Y: -29.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -10.97%

EZPZ

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 4.08%
• 6M: -18.15%
• YTD: -29.45%
• 1Y: -46.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	$15.29K	$11.99K	$25.71K
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$87.09K	$145.30K	$219.56K

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	-21.35%	8.90%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-29.45%	11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAP and EZPZ is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025	0.95

The correlation between BFAP and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFAP vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFAP

BFAP Risk / Return Rank: 1
BFAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BFAP Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFAP	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.36	-0.98	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.92	-1.46	-0.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.84	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.86	-0.83	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	-1.25	-0.12

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAP Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAP and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAP drawdown since its inception was -34.15%, smaller than the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAP and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFAP	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.15%	-56.63%	+22.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.15%	-56.63%	+22.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.65%	-52.42%	+20.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.41%	-25.29%	+11.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.36%	37.39%	-16.03%

Volatility

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April (BFAP) is 3.75%, while Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that BFAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFAP	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.75%	8.21%	-4.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.78%	35.14%	-21.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.57%	47.73%	-26.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.98%	46.83%	-26.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.98%	46.83%	-26.85%

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFAP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFAP vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

BFAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.12%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BFAP FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April	24.12%	18.97%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFAP and EZPZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BFAP and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BFAP or EZPZ?

EZPZ has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to BFAP (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAP dropped -34.15% vs EZPZ's -56.63%.

Which ETF is better, BFAP or EZPZ?

On 1-year performance, BFAP leads with -29.14% vs -46.61% for EZPZ. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BFAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFAP or EZPZ?

Over the 1-year period, BFAP has performed better with a -29.14% return vs -46.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFAP or EZPZ?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFAP or EZPZ?

BFAP has the higher dividend yield at 24.12%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between BFAP and EZPZ?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFAP and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.98 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.