BFAM vs. VTI
BFAM (Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.) is a stock, while VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Over the past 10 years, BFAM returned 1.47%/yr vs 14.66%/yr for VTI. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BFAM vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAM achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BFAM has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 1.47%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.66% annualized return.
BFAM
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- -17.26%
- YTD
- -24.78%
- 1Y
- -39.03%
- 3Y*
- -6.25%
- 5Y*
- -11.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.77%
VTI
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 23.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.66%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $69.91M | $67.03M | $89.53M | |
| $1.08B | $1.16B | $1.24B |
BFAM vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFAM Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. | -24.78% | -8.53% | 17.63% | 49.35% | -49.87% | -27.23% | 15.10% | 34.85% | 18.56% | 34.25% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 12.18% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAM and VTI is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BFAM and VTI has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAM vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
BFAM
VTI
BFAM vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFAM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.32 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 2.67 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 11.50 | -12.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFAM vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAM drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAM and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.32% | -55.45% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.30% | -8.92% | -43.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.94% | -19.30% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.15% | -25.36% | -41.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.32% | -35.00% | -34.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.02% | 0.00% | -58.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -7.98% | -12.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.23% | 2.07% | +29.16% |
Volatility
BFAM vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) has a higher volatility of 12.76% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.78%. This indicates that BFAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAM | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.76% | 3.78% | +8.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.69% | 10.33% | +28.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.37% | 13.08% | +32.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.18% | 17.53% | +20.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.17% | 18.31% | +17.86% |
Dividends
BFAM vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
BFAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFAM Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAM and VTI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFAM has higher volatility (12.76%) compared to VTI (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAM dropped -69.32% vs VTI's -55.45%.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFAM and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer