BFAM vs. LRN

In the year-to-date period, BFAM achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 45.00% return. Over the past 10 years, BFAM has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 8.78%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 25.21% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BFAM Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the LRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAM and LRN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither BFAM nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum BFAM drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAM and LRN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) has a higher volatility of 13.89% compared to Stride, Inc. (LRN) at 11.63%. This indicates that BFAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.