BFAM vs. LRN
BFAM (Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.) and LRN (Stride, Inc.) are both stocks. BFAM operates in Personal Services (Consumer Cyclical), while LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BFAM returned 0.13%/yr vs 21.85%/yr for LRN. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BFAM vs. LRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFAM achieves a -35.07% return, which is significantly lower than LRN's 27.80% return. Over the past 10 years, BFAM has underperformed LRN with an annualized return of 0.13%, while LRN has yielded a comparatively higher 21.85% annualized return.
BFAM
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -2.82%
- YTD
- -35.07%
- 6M
- -33.88%
- 1Y
- -46.37%
- 3Y*
- -9.91%
- 5Y*
- -15.08%
- 10Y*
- 0.13%
LRN
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- 27.80%
- 6M
- 26.78%
- 1Y
- -43.59%
- 3Y*
- 30.26%
- 5Y*
- 20.08%
- 10Y*
- 21.85%
BFAM vs. LRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFAM Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. | -35.07% | -8.53% | 17.63% | 49.35% | -49.87% | -27.23% | 15.10% | 34.85% | 18.56% | 34.25% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 27.80% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFAM and LRN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2013 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
BFAM:
$3.60B
LRN:
$3.95B
BFAM:
$4.00
LRN:
$9.68
BFAM:
16.46
LRN:
8.57
BFAM:
0.47
LRN:
0.21
BFAM:
1.25
LRN:
1.58
BFAM:
3.14
LRN:
2.41
BFAM:
$2.98B
LRN:
$2.54B
BFAM:
$702.07M
LRN:
$972.24M
BFAM:
$388.87M
LRN:
$424.60M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFAM vs. LRN — Risk / Return Rank
BFAM
LRN
BFAM vs. LRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) and Stride, Inc. (LRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFAM | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.68 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | -1.02 | -0.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFAM vs. LRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFAM drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum LRN drawdown of -81.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAM and LRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFAM | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.32% | -81.41% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.69% | -64.07% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.94% | -64.07% | +6.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.15% | -64.07% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.32% | -64.07% | -5.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.76% | -51.13% | -12.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -36.29% | +16.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.24% | 42.84% | -14.60% |
Volatility
BFAM vs. LRN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) is 14.53%, while Stride, Inc. (LRN) has a volatility of 18.08%. This indicates that BFAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFAM | LRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 18.08% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.57% | 28.88% | +7.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.58% | 68.27% | -23.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.77% | 51.80% | -14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.91% | 49.40% | -13.49% |
Dividends
BFAM vs. LRN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFAM nor LRN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BFAM vs. LRN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. and Stride, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BFAM vs. LRN - Profitability Comparison
BFAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported a gross profit of 163.49M and revenue of 712.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
BFAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported an operating income of 64.95M and revenue of 712.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
BFAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported a net income of 71.75M and revenue of 712.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFAM and LRN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRN has higher volatility (18.08%) compared to BFAM (14.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAM dropped -69.32% vs LRN's -81.41%.
LRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFAM and LRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer