PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFAM vs. APP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BFAM vs. APP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFAM achieves a -35.07% return, which is significantly lower than APP's -30.69% return.


BFAM

1D
2.84%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
-35.07%
6M
-33.88%
1Y
-46.37%
3Y*
-9.91%
5Y*
-15.08%
10Y*
0.13%

APP

1D
-0.50%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
-30.69%
6M
-35.89%
1Y
39.24%
3Y*
171.29%
5Y*
40.77%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFAM vs. APP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BFAM
Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc.
-35.07%-8.53%17.63%49.35%-49.87%-23.59%
APP
AppLovin Corporation
-30.69%108.08%712.62%278.44%-88.83%34.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BFAM and APP is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.28

The correlation between BFAM and APP shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BFAM:

$3.60B

APP:

$158.19B

EPS

BFAM:

$4.00

APP:

$11.64

PE Ratio

BFAM:

16.46

APP:

40.12

PEG Ratio

BFAM:

0.47

APP:

0.12

PS Ratio

BFAM:

1.25

APP:

25.79

PB Ratio

BFAM:

3.14

APP:

66.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

BFAM:

$2.98B

APP:

$6.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BFAM:

$702.07M

APP:

$5.45B

EBITDA (TTM)

BFAM:

$388.87M

APP:

$4.87B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFAM vs. APP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFAM
BFAM Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BFAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFAM Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BFAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFAM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

APP
APP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
APP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
APP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
APP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
APP Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFAM vs. APP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) and AppLovin Corporation (APP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFAMAPPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.15

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.79

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.64

1.54

-3.19

BFAM vs. APP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFAM Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the APP Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFAM and APP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFAM vs. APP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFAM drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, smaller than the maximum APP drawdown of -91.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFAM and APP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFAMAPPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-91.90%

+22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.69%

-49.99%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.94%

-57.00%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.15%

-91.90%

+24.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.76%

-36.34%

-27.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-42.48%

+22.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.24%

25.48%

+2.76%

Volatility

BFAM vs. APP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. (BFAM) is 14.53%, while AppLovin Corporation (APP) has a volatility of 20.85%. This indicates that BFAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFAMAPPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.53%

20.85%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.57%

58.78%

-22.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.58%

70.97%

-26.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.77%

77.90%

-40.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.91%

77.45%

-41.54%

Dividends

BFAM vs. APP - Dividend Comparison

Neither BFAM nor APP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BFAM vs. APP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. and AppLovin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
712.22M
1.84B
(BFAM) Total Revenue
(APP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BFAM vs. APP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. and AppLovin Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
23.0%
89.0%
Portfolio components
BFAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported a gross profit of 163.49M and revenue of 712.22M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.0%.

APP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 1.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.0%.

BFAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported an operating income of 64.95M and revenue of 712.22M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

APP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.44B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 78.2%.

BFAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bright Horizons Family Solutions Inc. reported a net income of 71.75M and revenue of 712.22M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

APP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AppLovin Corporation reported a net income of 1.21B and revenue of 1.84B, resulting in a net margin of 65.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BFAM and APP have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APP has higher volatility (20.85%) compared to BFAM (14.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFAM dropped -69.32% vs APP's -91.90%.

APP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFAM and APP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer