PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BF-B vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BF-B vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BF-B achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 4.86% return. Over the past 10 years, BF-B has underperformed PG with an annualized return of -2.31%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.46% annualized return.


BF-B

1D
-0.45%
1M
-1.31%
6M
-1.57%
YTD
2.70%
1Y
-4.11%
3Y*
-25.57%
5Y*
-16.26%
10Y*
-2.31%
ALL TIME*
12.69%

PG

1D
-0.69%
1M
-1.52%
6M
2.23%
YTD
4.86%
1Y
-2.39%
3Y*
1.32%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
8.46%
ALL TIME*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BF-B vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
2.70%-29.29%-32.23%-11.91%-8.86%-6.07%18.67%43.78%-10.98%55.01%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
4.86%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BF-B and PG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 1984

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BF-B:

$12.26B

PG:

$344.91B

EPS

BF-B:

$1.71

PG:

$5.24

PE Ratio

BF-B:

15.40

PG:

28.25

PEG Ratio

BF-B:

19.14

PG:

6.91

PS Ratio

BF-B:

3.18

PG:

4.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

BF-B:

$3.91B

PG:

$86.72B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BF-B:

$2.32B

PG:

$43.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

BF-B:

$1.19B

PG:

$22.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BF-B vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BF-B
BF-B Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BF-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BF-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BF-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BF-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BF-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BF-B vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BF-BPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.00

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

-0.15

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.35

-0.27

-0.08

BF-B vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BF-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is comparable to the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BF-B and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BF-B vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BF-B drawdown since its inception was -68.96%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BF-B and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BF-BPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.96%

-54.25%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-15.52%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.65%

-21.15%

-44.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.31%

-23.77%

-44.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.96%

-23.77%

-45.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.89%

-14.17%

-49.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.74%

-12.17%

+0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

8.89%

+2.97%

Volatility

BF-B vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.37%. This indicates that BF-B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BF-BPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

7.37%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.54%

15.87%

+15.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.70%

19.66%

+19.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.26%

18.08%

+12.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

19.17%

+9.03%

Dividends

BF-B vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

BF-B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than PG's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
3.50%3.49%2.32%1.46%1.17%2.37%0.88%0.99%3.10%1.09%1.54%1.29%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.16%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%

Financials

BF-B vs. PG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown-Forman Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.06B
21.24B
(BF-B) Total Revenue
(PG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BF-B vs. PG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brown-Forman Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
60.6%
49.5%
Portfolio components
BF-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a gross profit of 640.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

PG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a gross profit of 10.51B and revenue of 21.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

BF-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported an operating income of 343.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

PG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported an operating income of 4.58B and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

BF-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a net income of 267.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.

PG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, The Procter & Gamble Company reported a net income of 18.50M and revenue of 21.24B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BF-B and PG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BF-B has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to PG (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BF-B dropped -68.96% vs PG's -54.25%.

BF-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BF-B and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer