BEZ vs. METD
BEZ (Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. BEZ is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.
Performance
BEZ vs. METD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEZ
- 1D
- 10.37%
- 1M
- -25.67%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METD
- 1D
- 2.72%
- 1M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 17.24%
- 1Y
- 22.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEZ vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEZ Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF | -95.00% |
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 19.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEZ and METD is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEZ vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank
BEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
METD
BEZ vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF (BEZ) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEZ | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.15 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEZ vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEZ drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEZ and METD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEZ | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -46.03% | -50.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.49% | -25.62% | -69.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.72% | -28.59% | -36.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.70% | — |
Volatility
BEZ vs. METD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEZ | METD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 28.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.90% | 36.55% | +184.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 220.90% | 36.62% | +184.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 220.90% | 36.62% | +184.28% |
BEZ vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEZ vs. METD - Dividend Comparison
BEZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BEZ Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF | 2.39% | 3.35% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEZ and METD have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, METD is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
METD is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for BEZ.
METD has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.00% for BEZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for BEZ and 1.00% for METD.
Find the right allocation for BEZ and METD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer