BEZ vs. DOG
BEZ (Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF) and DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) are both Inverse Equities funds - BEZ tracks the Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) while DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DOG.
Performance
BEZ vs. DOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BEZ
- 1D
- 10.37%
- 1M
- -25.67%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- -6.19%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- -13.88%
- 3Y*
- -9.11%
- 5Y*
- -5.85%
- 10Y*
- -11.67%
BEZ vs. DOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BEZ Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF | -95.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEZ and DOG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEZ vs. DOG — Risk / Return Rank
BEZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DOG
BEZ vs. DOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF (BEZ) and ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.86 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEZ vs. DOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEZ drawdown since its inception was -96.31%, roughly equal to the maximum DOG drawdown of -92.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEZ and DOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.31% | -92.79% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -70.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.49% | -92.77% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.72% | -66.46% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.97% | — |
Volatility
BEZ vs. DOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEZ | DOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.90% | 12.38% | +208.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 220.90% | 14.83% | +206.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 220.90% | 17.48% | +203.42% |
BEZ vs. DOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than DOG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEZ vs. DOG - Dividend Comparison
BEZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEZ Tradr 2X Short BE Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.36% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEZ and DOG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for BEZ.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for BEZ.
BEZ tracks Bloom Energy Corporation (BE), while DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for BEZ and 0.95% for DOG.
Find the right allocation for BEZ and DOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer