PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETH vs. UPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETH vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -32.64% return, which is significantly lower than UPRO's 17.21% return.


BETH

1D
-3.37%
1M
-18.22%
YTD
-32.64%
6M
-32.87%
1Y
-40.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UPRO

1D
-4.27%
1M
-5.38%
YTD
17.21%
6M
13.86%
1Y
62.29%
3Y*
46.23%
5Y*
20.37%
10Y*
30.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-32.64%-11.20%85.03%39.34%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
17.21%31.88%63.57%33.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and UPRO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETH vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

UPRO
UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BETHUPRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.28

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

2.34

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

9.52

-10.75

BETH vs. UPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the UPRO Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and UPRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BETH vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and UPRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETHUPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-76.82%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.03%

-26.78%

-29.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.48%

-10.27%

-44.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-14.39%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.01%

6.57%

+26.44%

Volatility

BETH vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) is 13.75%, while ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that BETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETHUPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

14.68%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.61%

29.49%

+7.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.49%

37.35%

+10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.18%

50.62%

+0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

53.79%

-2.61%

BETH vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

BETH vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.67%, more than UPRO's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
60.67%57.68%19.71%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P 500
0.74%0.84%0.93%0.74%0.52%0.06%0.11%0.41%0.63%0.00%0.12%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


BETH and UPRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPRO has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to BETH (13.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -56.03% vs UPRO's -76.82%.

On 1-year performance, UPRO leads with 62.29% vs -40.77% for BETH. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 13.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, UPRO has performed better with a 62.29% return vs -40.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETH.

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 60.67%, compared with 0.74% for UPRO.

BETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while UPRO is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETH and 0.89% for UPRO.

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETH and UPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer