BETH vs. IGLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) and IGLD (FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while IGLD is a Gold fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BETH returned -40.77% vs 14.83% for IGLD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for IGLD.

Performance

BETH vs. IGLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -32.64% return, which is significantly lower than IGLD's -5.55% return.

BETH

• 1D: -3.37%
• 1M: -18.22%
• YTD: -32.64%
• 6M: -32.87%
• 1Y: -40.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGLD

• 1D: -1.96%
• 1M: -8.08%
• YTD: -5.55%
• 6M: -8.37%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 12.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. IGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	-32.64%	-11.20%	85.03%	39.34%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	-5.55%	47.46%	19.36%	8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and IGLD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	0.11

Return for Risk

BETH vs. IGLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH

BETH Risk / Return Rank: 3
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 3

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 18
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 20
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. IGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETH	IGLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.86	0.61	-1.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.18	0.94	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.14	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	0.68	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	1.94	-3.17

BETH vs. IGLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the IGLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and IGLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETH vs. IGLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, which is greater than IGLD's maximum drawdown of -21.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and IGLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETH	IGLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.03%	-21.90%	-34.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.03%	-21.90%	-34.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.90%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.48%	-21.20%	-33.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-5.37%	-12.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.01%	7.68%	+25.33%

Volatility

BETH vs. IGLD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) at 8.14%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETH	IGLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.75%	8.14%	+5.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.61%	22.34%	+14.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.49%	24.40%	+23.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.18%	15.48%	+35.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.18%	15.30%	+35.88%

BETH vs. IGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IGLD's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETH vs. IGLD - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.67%, more than IGLD's 19.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	60.67%	57.68%	19.71%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%
IGLD FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	19.29%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETH and IGLD in my portfolio?

BETH and IGLD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETH or IGLD?

BETH has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to IGLD (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -56.03% vs IGLD's -21.90%.

Which ETF is better, BETH or IGLD?

On 1-year performance, IGLD leads with 14.83% vs -40.77% for BETH. On fees, IGLD is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, IGLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETH or IGLD?

Over the 1-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 14.83% return vs -40.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETH or IGLD?

IGLD is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETH or IGLD?

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 60.67%, compared with 19.29% for IGLD.

What is the main difference between BETH and IGLD?

BETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IGLD is Gold. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETH and 0.85% for IGLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.