PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETH vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -28.99% return, which is significantly lower than IBIT's -25.48% return.


BETH

1D
-3.09%
1M
-19.49%
YTD
-28.99%
6M
-33.42%
1Y
-40.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-28.99%-11.20%68.33%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and IBIT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.99

The correlation between BETH and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETHIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.86

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.79

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.36

+0.06

BETH vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is comparable to the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETHIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.86

-0.89

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.30

+0.12

Drawdowns

BETH vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -52.55%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETHIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.55%

-49.36%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.55%

-49.36%

-3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.01%

-48.10%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.60%

-16.02%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.70%

28.44%

+2.26%

Volatility

BETH vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) have volatilities of 9.53% and 9.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETHIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

9.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.39%

34.44%

+1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

43.73%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.18%

50.19%

+0.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

50.19%

+0.99%

BETH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BETH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.55%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
57.55%57.68%19.71%0.36%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BETH and IBIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BETH has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to IBIT (9.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -52.55% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, IBIT leads with -38.74% vs -40.13% for BETH. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBIT has performed better with a -38.74% return vs -40.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETH.

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 57.55%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETH and 0.25% for IBIT.

BETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETH and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer