BETH vs. EETH
BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF) and EETH (ProShares Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from ProShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BETH returned -46.26% vs -48.96% for EETH. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
BETH vs. EETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -30.33% return, which is significantly higher than EETH's -38.48% return.
BETH
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- 6M
- -19.99%
- YTD
- -30.33%
- 1Y
- -46.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.89%
EETH
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- 6M
- -20.87%
- YTD
- -38.48%
- 1Y
- -48.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -3.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.41K | $34.66K | $70.89K | |
| $622.60K | $670.08K | $765.41K |
BETH vs. EETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF | -30.33% | -11.20% | 85.03% | 39.34% |
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | -38.48% | -17.19% | 33.29% | 31.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between BETH and EETH is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BETH and EETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BETH vs. EETH — Risk / Return Rank
BETH
EETH
BETH vs. EETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF (BETH) and ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | -0.71 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | -1.05 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BETH vs. EETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -57.12%, smaller than the maximum EETH drawdown of -69.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and EETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.12% | -69.22% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.12% | -69.22% | +12.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.92% | -63.07% | +10.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -31.52% | +11.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.53% | 46.71% | -9.18% |
Volatility
BETH vs. EETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF (BETH) is 9.28%, while ProShares Ether Strategy ETF (EETH) has a volatility of 12.32%. This indicates that BETH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BETH | EETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.28% | 12.32% | -3.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.74% | 45.70% | -9.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.66% | 67.47% | -19.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 68.31% | -17.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 68.31% | -17.71% |
BETH vs. EETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BETH and EETH have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
BETH vs. EETH - Dividend Comparison
BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 41.57%, less than EETH's 73.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight ETF | 41.57% | 57.68% | 19.71% | 0.36% |
EETH ProShares Ether Strategy ETF | 73.71% | 56.98% | 10.82% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BETH and EETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EETH has higher volatility (12.32%) compared to BETH (9.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -57.12% vs EETH's -69.22%.
On 1-year performance, BETH leads with -46.26% vs -48.96% for EETH. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BETH has performed better with a -46.26% return vs -48.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BETH and EETH have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
EETH has the higher dividend yield at 73.71%, compared with 41.57% for BETH.
EETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BETH and EETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer