PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETH vs. BITC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BETH vs. BITC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BETH vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-23.96%-11.20%85.03%42.75%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.39%-20.46%97.86%41.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -23.96% return, which is significantly lower than BITC's -0.39% return.


BETH

1D
0.78%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-23.96%
6M
-44.92%
1Y
-19.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETH vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BETH vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETHBITCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

-0.36

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.28

-0.33

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.95

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.32

-0.36

+0.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

-0.58

-0.09

BETH vs. BITC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is comparable to the BITC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and BITC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETHBITCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

-0.36

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.64

-0.14

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and BITC is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BETH vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.89%, more than BITC's 3.38% yield.


TTM202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
62.89%57.68%19.71%0.36%
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.38%3.36%42.68%5.82%

Drawdowns

BETH vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -52.55%, which is greater than BITC's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and BITC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BETHBITCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.55%

-38.51%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.55%

-26.51%

-26.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.62%

-31.54%

-17.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-15.81%

0.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.90%

16.53%

+8.37%

Volatility

BETH vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) at 12.07%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BETHBITCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.77%

12.07%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.46%

19.16%

+20.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.58%

26.66%

+21.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.11%

47.60%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.11%

47.60%

+4.51%