BETH vs. BFJL

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) and BFJL (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July) are both exchange-traded funds - BETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while BFJL is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Over the past year, BETH returned -48.65% vs -16.83% for BFJL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BFJL.

Performance

BETH vs. BFJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -32.25% return, which is significantly lower than BFJL's -5.93% return.

BETH

• 1D: -2.63%
• 1M: -1.29%
• 6M: -35.06%
• YTD: -32.25%
• 1Y: -48.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BFJL

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: -7.31%
• YTD: -5.93%
• 1Y: -16.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. BFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	-32.25%	-15.93%
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	-5.93%	-7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and BFJL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.89

The correlation between BETH and BFJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BETH vs. BFJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH

BETH Risk / Return Rank: 2
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BFJL

BFJL Risk / Return Rank: 2
BFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. BFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETH	BFJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.03	-1.28	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.57	-1.73	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.79	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	-0.79	-0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.38	-1.11	-0.27

BETH vs. BFJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is comparable to the BFJL Sharpe Ratio of -1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and BFJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETH vs. BFJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -57.12%, which is greater than BFJL's maximum drawdown of -21.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and BFJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETH	BFJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.12%	-21.27%	-35.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.12%	-21.27%	-35.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.21%	-19.71%	-34.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.99%	-12.61%	-6.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.30%	15.15%	+20.15%

Volatility

BETH vs. BFJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July (BFJL) at 2.36%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETH	BFJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.98%	2.36%	+9.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.80%	6.78%	+30.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.57%	13.18%	+34.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.96%	13.24%	+37.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.96%	13.24%	+37.72%

BETH vs. BFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BFJL's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETH vs. BFJL - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.79%, more than BFJL's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	54.79%	57.68%	19.71%	0.36%
BFJL FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - July	1.43%	1.35%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETH and BFJL in my portfolio?

BETH and BFJL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETH or BFJL?

BETH has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to BFJL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -57.12% vs BFJL's -21.27%.

Which ETF is better, BETH or BFJL?

On 1-year performance, BFJL leads with -16.83% vs -48.65% for BETH. On fees, BFJL is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, BFJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETH or BFJL?

Over the 1-year period, BFJL has performed better with a -16.83% return vs -48.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETH or BFJL?

BFJL is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETH or BFJL?

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 54.79%, compared with 1.43% for BFJL.

What is the main difference between BETH and BFJL?

BETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFJL is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETH and 0.90% for BFJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.03 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.