BETE vs. RSBY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by ProShares, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Over the past year, BETE returned -43.75% vs 17.35% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

BETE vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.94% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.52% return.

BETE

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 4.00%
• 6M: -36.74%
• YTD: -34.94%
• 1Y: -43.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 17.92%
• YTD: 18.52%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.94%	-8.17%	38.07%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.52%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and RSBY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.13

Return for Risk

BETE vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 51
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	1.50	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.91	2.18	-3.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.26	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.66	2.15	-2.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.06	5.04	-6.10

BETE vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-23.32%	-38.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-7.95%	-53.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.34%	-6.45%	-50.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.74%	-13.35%	-9.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.25%	3.39%	+34.86%

Volatility

BETE vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 3.15%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.57%	3.15%	+10.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.64%	8.37%	+32.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.71%	11.41%	+44.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.37%	13.37%	+43.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.37%	13.37%	+43.00%

BETE vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 80.19%, more than RSBY's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	80.19%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and RSBY in my portfolio?

BETE and RSBY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or RSBY?

BETE has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to RSBY (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 17.35% vs -43.75% for BETE. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 17.35% return vs -43.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or RSBY?

BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or RSBY?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 80.19%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.

What is the main difference between BETE and RSBY?

BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.