BETE vs. HOOW

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETE is a Cryptocurrency fund managed by ProShares, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, BETE returned -41.25% vs 4.08% for HOOW. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.

Performance

BETE vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -41.67% return, which is significantly lower than HOOW's -24.30% return.

BETE

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -23.42%
• YTD: -41.67%
• 6M: -41.18%
• 1Y: -41.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOW

• 1D: -4.62%
• 1M: 29.89%
• YTD: -24.30%
• 6M: -29.79%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETE vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-41.67%	0.11%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	-24.30%	52.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and HOOW is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.60

The correlation between BETE and HOOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BETE vs. HOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 4

HOOW

HOOW Risk / Return Rank: 12
HOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
HOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 14
HOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
HOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETE vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	HOOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.74	0.05	-0.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.94	0.70	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.08	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	0.06	-0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.14	0.11	-1.24

BETE vs. HOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.74, which is lower than the HOOW Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and HOOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and HOOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	HOOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-65.74%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-65.74%	+3.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.75%	-48.59%	-13.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-30.10%	+7.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	36.38%	38.29%	-1.91%

Volatility

BETE vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) is 16.09%, while Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW) has a volatility of 30.22%. This indicates that BETE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	HOOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.09%	30.22%	-14.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.25%	62.61%	-22.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.79%	84.31%	-28.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.57%	84.25%	-27.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.57%	84.25%	-27.68%

BETE vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 94.76%, less than HOOW's 153.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	94.76%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF	153.62%	67.92%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and HOOW in my portfolio?

BETE and HOOW have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETE or HOOW?

HOOW has higher volatility (30.22%) compared to BETE (16.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs HOOW's -65.74%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or HOOW?

On 1-year performance, HOOW leads with 4.08% vs -41.25% for BETE. On fees, BETE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BETE has been the lower-risk option at 16.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or HOOW?

Over the 1-year period, HOOW has performed better with a 4.08% return vs -41.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or HOOW?

BETE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for HOOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or HOOW?

HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 153.62%, compared with 94.76% for BETE.

What is the main difference between BETE and HOOW?

BETE is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.99% for HOOW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HOOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.