BETE vs. EZPZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BETE (Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BETE is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. Over the past year, BETE returned -46.67% vs -46.59% for EZPZ. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. BETE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.

Performance

BETE vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETE achieves a -34.37% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -30.76% return.

BETE

• 1D: -3.01%
• 1M: 5.60%
• 6M: -28.81%
• YTD: -34.37%
• 1Y: -46.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.68%

EZPZ

• 1D: -2.61%
• 1M: 2.14%
• 6M: -27.14%
• YTD: -30.76%
• 1Y: -46.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -28.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	$107.88K	$90.06K	$96.80K
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	$118.67K	$153.22K	$218.96K

BETE vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	-34.37%	0.92%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	-30.76%	-10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BETE and EZPZ is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.97

The correlation between BETE and EZPZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BETE vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BETE

BETE Risk / Return Rank: 3
BETE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BETE Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BETE Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EZPZ

EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BETE vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETE	EZPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	-1.02	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.30	-1.55	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	0.83	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.86	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	-1.31	+0.09

BETE vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETE Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is comparable to the EZPZ Sharpe Ratio of -1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETE and EZPZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETE vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETE drawdown since its inception was -61.75%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -56.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETE and EZPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETE	EZPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.75%	-56.63%	-5.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.75%	-56.63%	-5.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.97%	-53.31%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.44%	-25.14%	+1.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.62%	37.10%	+3.52%

Volatility

BETE vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison

Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF (BETE) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ) at 9.34%. This indicates that BETE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EZPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETE	EZPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.10%	9.34%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.57%	36.00%	+3.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	55.28%	47.82%	+7.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.01%	46.94%	+9.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	56.01%	46.94%	+9.07%

BETE vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETE vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

BETE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 79.50%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BETE Proshares Bitcoin & Ether Equal Weight Strategy ETF	64.54%	68.22%	15.22%	0.78%
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETE and EZPZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, BETE and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BETE or EZPZ?

BETE has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to EZPZ (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETE dropped -61.75% vs EZPZ's -56.63%.

Which ETF is better, BETE or EZPZ?

On 1-year performance, EZPZ leads with -46.59% vs -46.67% for BETE. On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, EZPZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETE or EZPZ?

Over the 1-year period, EZPZ has performed better with a -46.59% return vs -46.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETE or EZPZ?

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETE or EZPZ?

BETE has the higher dividend yield at 64.54%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.

What is the main difference between BETE and EZPZ?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETE and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BETE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.89 vs -1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.