PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETA vs. ISRG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BETA vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BETA Technologies, Inc (BETA) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETA achieves a -34.21% return, which is significantly lower than ISRG's -28.09% return.


BETA

1D
2.94%
1M
14.22%
YTD
-34.21%
6M
-34.58%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ISRG

1D
1.24%
1M
-9.96%
YTD
-28.09%
6M
-28.51%
1Y
-26.20%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
19.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETA vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BETA
BETA Technologies, Inc
-34.21%-21.64%
ISRG
Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
-28.09%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BETA and ISRG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BETA:

$4.28B

ISRG:

$146.54B

EPS

BETA:

-$3.43

ISRG:

$8.24

PS Ratio

BETA:

112.28

ISRG:

13.91

PB Ratio

BETA:

2.48

ISRG:

8.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

BETA:

$37.97M

ISRG:

$10.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BETA:

$19.08M

ISRG:

$7.02B

EBITDA (TTM)

BETA:

-$768.23M

ISRG:

$3.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETA vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETA

ISRG
ISRG Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ISRG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISRG Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISRG Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ISRG Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISRG Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETA vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BETA Technologies, Inc (BETA) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BETA vs. ISRG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETAISRGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.88

0.47

-1.35

Drawdowns

BETA vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETA drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETA and ISRG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETAISRGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.07%

-82.26%

+19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.57%

-33.28%

-16.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.57%

-21.27%

-19.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.91%

Volatility

BETA vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETAISRGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.91%

30.83%

+48.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.91%

33.15%

+45.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.91%

32.38%

+46.53%

Dividends

BETA vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BETA nor ISRG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

BETA vs. ISRG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BETA Technologies, Inc and Intuitive Surgical, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
10.13M
2.77B
(BETA) Total Revenue
(ISRG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BETA and ISRG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETA and ISRG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer