BESO vs. ETHD
BESO (GSR Crypto Core3 ETF) and ETHD (ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. BESO charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for ETHD.
Performance
BESO vs. ETHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BESO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 14.17%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHD
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -29.23%
- 6M
- 75.86%
- YTD
- 46.13%
- 1Y
- -46.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BESO vs. ETHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | -2.19% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 39.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BESO and ETHD is -0.89, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | -0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BESO vs. ETHD — Risk / Return Rank
BESO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHD
BESO vs. ETHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF (ETHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BESO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BESO vs. ETHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BESO drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, smaller than the maximum ETHD drawdown of -95.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESO and ETHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BESO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.08% | -95.59% | +77.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -78.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -88.58% | +82.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -66.75% | +57.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 59.69% | — |
Volatility
BESO vs. ETHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BESO | ETHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 42.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 93.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.31% | 136.89% | -94.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 142.04% | -99.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.31% | 142.04% | -99.73% |
BESO vs. ETHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BESO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHD's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
BESO vs. ETHD - Dividend Comparison
BESO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BESO GSR Crypto Core3 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ETHD ProShares UltraShort Ether ETF | 5.09% | 156.62% | 19.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BESO and ETHD have a correlation of -0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BESO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BESO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for ETHD.
ETHD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for BESO.
They also come from different issuers: GSR and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BESO and 1.01% for ETHD.
Find the right allocation for BESO and ETHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer