PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BESO vs. BFOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BESO vs. BFOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BESO

1D
-0.37%
1M
14.17%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFOC

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.38%
6M
-8.81%
YTD
-7.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BESO vs. BFOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BESO and BFOC is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BESO vs. BFOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GSR Crypto Core3 ETF (BESO) and FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - October (BFOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BESO vs. BFOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BESO vs. BFOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BESO drawdown since its inception was -18.08%, roughly equal to the maximum BFOC drawdown of -18.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BESO and BFOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BESOBFOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-18.41%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.68%

-17.91%

+12.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-13.09%

+3.75%

Volatility

BESO vs. BFOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BESOBFOCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.31%

12.06%

+30.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.31%

12.06%

+30.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.31%

12.06%

+30.25%

BESO vs. BFOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BESO has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BFOC's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

BESO vs. BFOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BESO nor BFOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BESO and BFOC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BFOC is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFOC is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BESO.

BESO and BFOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BESO is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while BFOC is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: GSR and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for BESO and 0.90% for BFOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BESO and BFOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer