PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEP vs. EPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BEP vs. EPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEP achieves a 38.52% return, which is significantly higher than EPD's 22.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP has outperformed EPD with an annualized return of 14.52%, while EPD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.


BEP

1D
-1.11%
1M
12.73%
YTD
38.52%
6M
34.00%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
3.51%
10Y*
14.52%

EPD

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
22.17%
6M
21.90%
1Y
28.84%
3Y*
21.77%
5Y*
17.36%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEP vs. EPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
38.52%25.65%-8.23%9.02%-26.48%-13.69%80.30%90.75%-20.95%24.51%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
22.17%9.45%28.00%17.71%18.32%21.40%-23.61%21.88%-1.32%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BEP and EPD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.21

The correlation between BEP and EPD shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BEP:

$11.08B

EPD:

$83.08B

EPS

BEP:

$0.66

EPD:

$2.69

PE Ratio

BEP:

55.24

EPD:

14.11

PEG Ratio

BEP:

0.40

EPD:

2.27

PS Ratio

BEP:

1.66

EPD:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

BEP:

$6.37B

EPD:

$51.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BEP:

$2.19B

EPD:

$7.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

BEP:

$4.69B

EPD:

$10.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEP vs. EPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEP
BEP Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEP Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EPD
EPD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEP vs. EPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEPEPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.94

3.83

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

11.90

-2.86

BEP vs. EPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the EPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEP and EPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEPEPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.82

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

1.01

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.54

+0.01

Drawdowns

BEP vs. EPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEP drawdown since its inception was -53.85%, smaller than the maximum EPD drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP and EPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEPEPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.85%

-58.78%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-7.56%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.58%

-15.40%

-20.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.46%

-18.06%

-29.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.85%

-58.04%

+4.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-4.55%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-10.13%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.21%

2.43%

+3.78%

Volatility

BEP vs. EPD - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (EPD) have volatilities of 6.80% and 6.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEPEPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.80%

6.55%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.38%

13.28%

+6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.91%

15.98%

+13.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.94%

17.23%

+13.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.99%

24.16%

+5.83%

Dividends

BEP vs. EPD - Dividend Comparison

BEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than EPD's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEP
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
4.19%5.53%6.23%5.14%5.05%4.42%2.68%4.42%7.57%5.36%5.99%6.34%
EPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P.
5.76%6.74%6.63%7.51%7.79%8.20%9.09%6.23%6.97%6.29%5.88%5.90%

Financials

BEP vs. EPD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.52B
14.39B
(BEP) Total Revenue
(EPD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BEP vs. EPD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. and Enterprise Products Partners L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
13.8%
13.1%
Portfolio components
BEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 210.05M and revenue of 1.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.8%.

EPD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 14.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.1%.

BEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 138.06M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

EPD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 1.82B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

BEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. reported a net income of -113.41M and revenue of 1.52B, resulting in a net margin of -7.5%.

EPD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. reported a net income of 1.48B and revenue of 14.39B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BEP and EPD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEP has higher volatility (6.80%) compared to EPD (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEP dropped -53.85% vs EPD's -58.78%.

BEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEP and EPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer