BENJ vs. TFLR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) and TFLR (T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon, while TFLR is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BENJ returned 3.80% vs 4.75% for TFLR. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BENJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TFLR.

Performance

BENJ vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BENJ achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly higher than TFLR's 2.00% return.

BENJ

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 1.81%
• YTD: 2.12%
• 1Y: 3.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.83%

TFLR

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.69%
• 6M: 2.22%
• YTD: 2.00%
• 1Y: 4.75%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	$6.98M	$4.68M	$2.43M
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	$4.30M	$3.86M	$3.99M

BENJ vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	2.12%	3.72%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	2.00%	5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and TFLR is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	-0.01

The correlation between BENJ and TFLR shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BENJ vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 100
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

TFLR

TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 80
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BENJ vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BENJ	TFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	11.26	2.39	+8.87
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	26.60	3.54	+23.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.46	1.54	+4.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	65.33	2.19	+63.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	362.26	9.97	+352.29

BENJ vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BENJ Sharpe Ratio is 11.26, which is higher than the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BENJ and TFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum TFLR drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and TFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BENJ	TFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-4.01%	+3.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.06%	-2.18%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.01%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.05%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.21%	+0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.48%	-0.47%

Volatility

BENJ vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) is 0.12%, while T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a volatility of 0.47%. This indicates that BENJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BENJ	TFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.12%	0.47%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.28%	1.75%	-1.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34%	2.00%	-1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.59%	3.61%	-3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.59%	3.61%	-3.02%

BENJ vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BENJ vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TFLR T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF	6.67%	6.93%	8.18%	7.76%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BENJ and TFLR in my portfolio?

BENJ and TFLR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BENJ or TFLR?

TFLR has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to BENJ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BENJ dropped -0.39% vs TFLR's -4.01%.

Which ETF is better, BENJ or TFLR?

On 1-year performance, TFLR leads with 4.75% vs 3.80% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BENJ or TFLR?

Over the 1-year period, TFLR has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BENJ or TFLR?

BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BENJ or TFLR?

TFLR has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between BENJ and TFLR?

BENJ is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while TFLR is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: Horizon and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 0.60% for TFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.26 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.