BENJ vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BENJ returned 3.79% vs 4.66% for MINT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BENJ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

BENJ vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BENJ achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.04% return.

BENJ

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.64%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 2.17%
• 1Y: 4.66%
• 3Y*: 5.35%
• 5Y*: 3.52%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BENJ vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	1.64%	3.72%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	2.04%	4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and MINT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

BENJ vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BENJ

BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BENJ vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BENJ	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.65	16.83	-11.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	9.14	60.67	-51.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	4.85	18.96	-14.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.74	94.08	-84.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.98	889.37	-843.39

BENJ vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BENJ Sharpe Ratio is 5.65, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 16.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BENJ and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BENJ	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-4.62%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.39%	-0.05%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.03%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.02%	-0.17%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.08%	0.01%	+0.07%

Volatility

BENJ vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) have volatilities of 0.11% and 0.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BENJ	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	0.11%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.25%	0.21%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67%	0.28%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.60%	0.58%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.60%	0.95%	-0.35%

BENJ vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

BENJ vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BENJ and MINT in my portfolio?

BENJ and MINT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BENJ or MINT?

MINT has higher volatility (0.11%) compared to BENJ (0.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BENJ dropped -0.39% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, BENJ or MINT?

On 1-year performance, MINT leads with 4.66% vs 3.79% for BENJ. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BENJ or MINT?

Over the 1-year period, MINT has performed better with a 4.66% return vs 3.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BENJ or MINT?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BENJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BENJ or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

What is the main difference between BENJ and MINT?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.83 vs 5.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.