PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BENJ vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BENJ vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BENJ having a 1.46% return and CLIP slightly higher at 1.52%.


BENJ

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLIP

1D
0.01%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.52%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BENJ vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
1.46%3.75%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
1.52%3.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BENJ and CLIP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BENJ vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BENJ
BENJ Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BENJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BENJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BENJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BENJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BENJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BENJ vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BENJCLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-11.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-63.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.95

21.25

-16.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.71

142.78

-133.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

45.83

1,155.67

-1,109.85

BENJ vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BENJ Sharpe Ratio is 5.65, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 17.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BENJ and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BENJCLIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.65

17.39

-11.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

6.41

10.71

-4.30

Drawdowns

BENJ vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BENJ drawdown since its inception was -0.39%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BENJ and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BENJCLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-0.08%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.39%

-0.03%

-0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-0.00%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.08%

0.00%

+0.08%

Volatility

BENJ vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) has a higher volatility of 0.07% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.05%. This indicates that BENJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BENJCLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

0.05%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

0.14%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67%

0.23%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.60%

0.44%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.60%

0.44%

+0.16%

BENJ vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BENJ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

BENJ vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.


PositionTTM202520242023
BENJ
Horizon Landmark ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.91%4.14%5.11%2.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


BENJ and CLIP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BENJ has higher volatility (0.07%) compared to CLIP (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BENJ dropped -0.39% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

On 1-year performance, CLIP leads with 3.98% vs 3.78% for BENJ. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CLIP has performed better with a 3.98% return vs 3.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BENJ.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BENJ and 0.07% for CLIP.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.39 vs 5.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BENJ and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer