BEMIX vs. FNCMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX).
BEMIX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 30, 2011. FNCMX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.96% | 47.83% | 4.01% | 22.53% | -15.91% | 1.68% | -6.17% | 18.60% | -15.56% | 26.00% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | -10.43% | 21.11% | 29.48% | 45.13% | -32.40% | 22.21% | 44.57% | 36.63% | -3.07% | 28.35% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEMIX achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than FNCMX's -10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, BEMIX has underperformed FNCMX with an annualized return of 8.04%, while FNCMX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.
BEMIX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 11.40%
- 1Y
- 45.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
FNCMX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -10.43%
- 6M
- -8.01%
- 1Y
- 20.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 16.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEMIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCMX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BEMIX vs. FNCMX — Risk / Return Rank
BEMIX
FNCMX
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) and Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEMIX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 0.91 | +1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.24 | 1.44 | +1.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.20 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 1.32 | +2.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.31 | 4.92 | +9.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEMIX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 0.91 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.46 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.75 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEMIX and FNCMX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Dividend Comparison
BEMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than FNCMX's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMIX Brandes Emerging Markets Fund | 2.09% | 2.15% | 3.04% | 2.45% | 2.86% | 2.31% | 1.31% | 2.56% | 1.55% | 1.41% | 2.20% | 1.54% |
FNCMX Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund | 0.57% | 0.51% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.47% | 0.67% | 4.41% | 1.93% | 0.03% | 1.01% | 1.50% |
Drawdowns
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEMIX drawdown since its inception was -46.05%, smaller than the maximum FNCMX drawdown of -55.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMIX and FNCMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEMIX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -55.08% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.07% | -13.25% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.37% | -35.64% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.05% | -35.64% | -10.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.07% | -13.01% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.32% | -7.91% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.56% | -0.65% |
Volatility
BEMIX vs. FNCMX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes Emerging Markets Fund (BEMIX) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index Fund (FNCMX) at 5.63%. This indicates that BEMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEMIX | FNCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 5.63% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.56% | 12.48% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.37% | 23.06% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 22.42% | -6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 21.97% | -5.01% |