PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEMB vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEMB vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a 1.73% return, which is significantly lower than YCS's 10.06% return.


BEMB

1D
0.16%
1M
1.36%
YTD
1.73%
6M
1.70%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
10Y*

YCS

1D
0.39%
1M
3.97%
YTD
10.06%
6M
11.27%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
23.65%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEMB vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BEMB
Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
1.73%12.27%5.51%8.88%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
10.06%9.04%35.41%20.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BEMB and YCS is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEMB vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEMB
BEMB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
BEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEMB vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEMBYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.38

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

4.14

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.11

13.04

-2.93

BEMB vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMB and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEMB vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEMBYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-49.56%

+43.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.67%

-8.30%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-23.05%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.93%

-19.87%

+18.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

2.63%

-1.78%

Volatility

BEMB vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is 1.35%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that BEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEMBYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

2.25%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.57%

11.91%

-8.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

16.93%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.86%

21.10%

-15.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.86%

18.82%

-12.96%

BEMB vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEMB vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BEMB
Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
6.85%6.88%6.31%5.46%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEMB and YCS have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to BEMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMB dropped -6.17% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 3-year performance, YCS leads with 18.53% vs 8.52% for BEMB. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, YCS has performed better with a 18.53% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.85%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

BEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BEMB and 1.00% for YCS.

YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEMB and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer