BEMB vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - BEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. BEMB is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BEMB returned 8.80%/yr vs 45.06%/yr for SLV. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEMB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

BEMB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 2.78% return.

BEMB

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.94%
• YTD: 1.27%
• 6M: 1.64%
• 1Y: 9.77%
• 3Y*: 8.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 24.76%
• 1Y: 110.59%
• 3Y*: 45.06%
• 5Y*: 20.76%
• 10Y*: 15.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEMB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	1.27%	12.27%	5.51%	8.88%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	2.78%	144.66%	20.89%	14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BEMB and SLV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2023	0.24

Return for Risk

BEMB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEMB

BEMB Risk / Return Rank: 67
BEMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BEMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BEMB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BEMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
BEMB Martin Ratio Rank: 64

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 47
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEMB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BEMB	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.89	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.07	+1.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.35	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.62	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.53	5.64	+5.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BEMB vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEMB Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMB and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BEMB	SLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.89	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.45	0.25	+1.21

Drawdowns

BEMB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEMB	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-76.28%	+70.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.67%	-42.45%	+38.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.17%	-42.45%	+36.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.45%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-42.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-37.30%	+36.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-44.67%	+43.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	19.67%	-18.82%

Volatility

BEMB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is 1.49%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that BEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEMB	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	16.30%	-14.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	58.31%	-54.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.26%	58.90%	-54.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.88%	36.15%	-30.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.88%	31.84%	-25.96%

BEMB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEMB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	6.88%	6.88%	6.31%	5.46%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEMB and SLV in my portfolio?

BEMB and SLV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEMB or SLV?

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to BEMB (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMB dropped -6.17% vs SLV's -76.28%.

Which ETF is better, BEMB or SLV?

On 3-year performance, SLV leads with 45.06% vs 8.80% for BEMB. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEMB or SLV?

Over the 3-year period, SLV has performed better with a 45.06% return vs 8.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEMB or SLV?

BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEMB or SLV?

BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between BEMB and SLV?

BEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SLV is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BEMB and 0.50% for SLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.