BEMB vs. IBIT
BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. BEMB is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, BEMB returned 8.89% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEMB charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
BEMB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- -28.88%
- 6M
- -28.88%
- 1Y
- -39.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEMB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.56% | 12.27% | 6.83% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.88% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEMB and IBIT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEMB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
BEMB
IBIT
BEMB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEMB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 0.86 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.77 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | -1.30 | +11.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEMB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEMB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -52.11% | +45.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.67% | -52.11% | +48.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -50.47% | +50.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.93% | -16.85% | +15.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 30.58% | -29.73% |
Volatility
BEMB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is 1.35%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 13.18%. This indicates that BEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEMB | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 13.18% | -11.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.57% | 34.64% | -31.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 44.31% | -39.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 50.22% | -44.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.87% | 50.22% | -44.35% |
BEMB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEMB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BEMB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
BEMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.86% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEMB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (13.18%) compared to BEMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEMB dropped -6.17% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, BEMB leads with 8.89% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BEMB has performed better with a 8.89% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.86%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
BEMB is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BEMB and 0.25% for IBIT.
BEMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEMB and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer