BEDZ vs. TMH

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BEDZ is actively managed, while TMH is passively managed. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.

Performance

BEDZ vs. TMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BEDZ

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 14.32%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.14%

TMH

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 6.96%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	$65.74K	$44.95K	$74.21K
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	$27.07K	$29.18K	$21.96K

BEDZ vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	6.51%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDZ and TMH is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.34

Return for Risk

BEDZ vs. TMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

TMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEDZ vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDZ	TMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	—	—

Drawdowns

BEDZ vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -10.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and TMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDZ	TMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.70%	-10.32%	-19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-4.33%	+1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-5.05%	-2.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BEDZ	TMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.40%	26.85%	-6.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	26.85%	-2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.66%	26.85%	-2.19%

BEDZ vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDZ vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison

BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than TMH's 4.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.06%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	4.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDZ and TMH in my portfolio?

BEDZ and TMH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BEDZ or TMH?

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDZ or TMH?

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDZ or TMH?

TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 2.06% for BEDZ.

What is the main difference between BEDZ and TMH?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.19% for TMH.