BEDY vs. ROE
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEDY charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ROE.
Performance
BEDY vs. ROE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 20.98% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 8.10%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 37.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDY vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 10.40% | 1.62% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 20.98% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and ROE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank
BEDY
ROE
BEDY vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEDY | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.27 | 1.39 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and ROE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -19.10% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.04% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -2.59% | +1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
BEDY vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | ROE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 13.94% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 15.78% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 15.78% | -3.80% |
BEDY vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDY vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than ROE's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.35% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF | 0.94% | 0.97% | 1.18% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and ROE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ROE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ROE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BEDY.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for BEDY and 0.49% for ROE.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and ROE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer