BEDY vs. MFVL
BEDY (BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BEDY vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDY achieves a 10.40% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
BEDY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.40%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDY vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 10.40% | 1.92% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDY and MFVL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDY vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (BEDY) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEDY | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.27 | 0.31 | +1.96 |
Drawdowns
BEDY vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDY drawdown since its inception was -6.25%, smaller than the maximum MFVL drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDY and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDY | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -7.03% | +0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -3.29% | +2.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -2.42% | +1.06% |
Volatility
BEDY vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDY | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 12.15% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 12.15% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 12.15% | -0.17% |
BEDY vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BEDY and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
BEDY vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
BEDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEDY BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 3.35% | 0.09% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDY and MFVL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEDY and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
BEDY has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: BNY Mellon and Motley Fool.
Find the right allocation for BEDY and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer