BEARX vs. FCSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX).
BEARX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 27, 1995. FCSPX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Jun 20, 2006.
Performance
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 8.44% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -22.95% | -19.95% | -5.96% | -15.76% |
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | -1.35% | 8.13% | 2.78% | 8.48% | -16.25% | -0.95% | 11.90% | 16.59% | -3.05% | 8.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than FCSPX's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BEARX has underperformed FCSPX with an annualized return of -13.36%, while FCSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.42% annualized return.
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- 1Y
- -10.09%
- 3Y*
- -12.93%
- 5Y*
- -9.96%
- 10Y*
- -13.36%
FCSPX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.71%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEARX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSPX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BEARX vs. FCSPX — Risk / Return Rank
BEARX
FCSPX
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEARX | FCSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | 1.08 | -1.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | 1.52 | -2.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.23 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.68 | -2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 5.54 | -5.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEARX | FCSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.61 | 1.08 | -1.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | 0.10 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.81 | 0.55 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.57 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between BEARX and FCSPX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Dividend Comparison
BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than FCSPX's 4.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 6.19% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCSPX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port | 4.38% | 4.59% | 3.95% | 3.35% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.51% | 3.95% | 4.88% | 4.09% | 4.30% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.38%, which is greater than FCSPX's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and FCSPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEARX | FCSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.38% | -22.68% | -72.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.53% | -3.19% | -23.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.32% | -22.68% | -25.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.77% | -22.68% | -56.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.91% | -2.71% | -92.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.84% | -4.17% | -56.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.54% | 0.97% | +20.57% |
Volatility
BEARX vs. FCSPX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Strategy Port (FCSPX) at 1.77%. This indicates that BEARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BEARX | FCSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 1.77% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.81% | 3.01% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 5.10% | +10.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 6.78% | +10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 6.21% | +10.41% |