PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BE vs. WPM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BE vs. WPM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BE achieves a 248.37% return, which is significantly higher than WPM's -4.13% return.


BE

1D
10.07%
1M
6.21%
YTD
248.37%
6M
246.89%
1Y
1,165.47%
3Y*
164.54%
5Y*
62.62%
10Y*

WPM

1D
1.25%
1M
-15.29%
YTD
-4.13%
6M
-5.23%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
38.78%
5Y*
22.00%
10Y*
17.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BE vs. WPM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
248.37%291.22%50.07%-22.59%-12.81%-23.48%283.67%-25.15%-46.63%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
-4.13%110.52%15.24%27.91%-7.53%4.22%41.82%54.62%-6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BE and WPM is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BE:

$96.78B

WPM:

$51.10B

EPS

BE:

$0.02

WPM:

$3.96

PE Ratio

BE:

13.69K

WPM:

28.38

PS Ratio

BE:

33.71

WPM:

18.60

PB Ratio

BE:

105.02

WPM:

5.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

BE:

$2.45B

WPM:

$2.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BE:

$761.91M

WPM:

$2.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

BE:

$88.83M

WPM:

$2.38B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BE vs. WPM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BE
BE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
BE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BE Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BE Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
BE Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

WPM
WPM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
WPM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WPM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WPM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
WPM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
WPM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BE vs. WPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEWPMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+10.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.13

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

25.65

0.74

+24.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

78.52

1.91

+76.61

BE vs. WPM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BE Sharpe Ratio is 10.64, which is higher than the WPM Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BE and WPM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BE vs. WPM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BE drawdown since its inception was -92.54%, which is greater than WPM's maximum drawdown of -48.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BE and WPM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEWPMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.54%

-48.64%

-43.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.94%

-34.92%

-11.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.42%

-34.92%

-18.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.87%

-43.29%

-32.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.48%

-32.01%

+19.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.68%

-18.91%

-32.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.99%

13.59%

+1.40%

Volatility

BE vs. WPM - Volatility Comparison

Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a higher volatility of 37.88% compared to Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) at 17.15%. This indicates that BE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEWPMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.88%

17.15%

+20.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.61%

39.95%

+37.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.92%

46.80%

+64.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.93%

35.67%

+51.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.00%

36.80%

+59.20%

Dividends

BE vs. WPM - Dividend Comparison

BE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WPM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BE
Bloom Energy Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPM
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
0.64%0.56%1.10%1.22%1.54%1.33%1.01%1.21%1.84%1.49%1.09%

Financials

BE vs. WPM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bloom Energy Corporation and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
751.05M
888.98M
(BE) Total Revenue
(WPM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BE vs. WPM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bloom Energy Corporation and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.0%
77.5%
Portfolio components
BE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 225.54M and revenue of 751.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

WPM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a gross profit of 689.26M and revenue of 888.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.5%.

BE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 72.19M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.6%.

WPM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported an operating income of 666.92M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 75.0%.

BE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 70.65M and revenue of 751.05M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

WPM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. reported a net income of 573.98M and revenue of 888.98M, resulting in a net margin of 64.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BE and WPM have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BE has higher volatility (37.88%) compared to WPM (17.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BE dropped -92.54% vs WPM's -48.64%.

BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.64 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BE and WPM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer