PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDYN vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BDYN vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return.


BDYN

1D
0.45%
1M
4.35%
YTD
8.61%
6M
9.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.97%
6M
29.40%
1Y
113.72%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BDYN
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
8.61%3.68%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
3.97%66.20%

Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and SLV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

0.42

BDYN vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BDYN
SLV

Technology

30.5%

-

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Industrials

10.8%

-

Communication Services

10.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Energy

5.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.5%

-

Basic Materials

1.3%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

BDYN
30.5%
SLV

-

Financial Services

BDYN
11.6%
SLV

-

Industrials

BDYN
10.8%
SLV

-

Communication Services

BDYN
10.0%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

BDYN
9.6%
SLV

-

Healthcare

BDYN
9.3%
SLV

-

Energy

BDYN
5.7%
SLV

-

Consumer Defensive

BDYN
3.4%
SLV

-

Utilities

BDYN
2.5%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

BDYN
1.3%
SLV
100.0%

Real Estate

BDYN
0.1%
SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BDYN vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDYN

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDYN vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDYNSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.25

+1.03

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BDYNSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-76.28%

+65.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-36.57%

+36.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.79%

-44.67%

+42.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.81%

Volatility

BDYN vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BDYNSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

58.90%

-44.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

36.15%

-22.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.14%

31.83%

-17.69%

BDYN vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

BDYN vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BDYN
iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
2.00%2.18%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BDYN and SLV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

BDYN is categorized as Global Equities, while SLV is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.50% for SLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BDYN and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer