BDYN vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BDYN (iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BDYN charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

BDYN vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDYN achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 38.47% return.

BDYN

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWD

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 10.81%
• YTD: 38.47%
• 6M: 37.27%
• 1Y: 72.96%
• 3Y*: 38.93%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDYN vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	8.61%	3.68%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	38.47%	5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BDYN and FWD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.85

BDYN vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDYN	FWD
Technology	30.5%	52.6%
Financial Services	11.6%	0.5%
Industrials	10.8%	17.7%
Communication Services	10.0%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	2.4%
Healthcare	9.3%	6.6%
Energy	5.7%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	0.8%
Utilities	2.5%	1.0%
Basic Materials	1.3%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.7%

Return for Risk

BDYN vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDYN vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF (BDYN) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDYN	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.28	1.65	-0.37

Drawdowns

BDYN vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDYN drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDYN and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDYN	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.85%	-29.02%	+18.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-1.44%	+1.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.79%	-4.06%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDYN	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.14%	24.18%	-10.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.14%	24.72%	-10.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.14%	24.72%	-10.58%

BDYN vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDYN has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDYN vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

BDYN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BDYN iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF	2.00%	2.18%	0.00%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDYN and FWD in my portfolio?

BDYN and FWD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BDYN or FWD?

On fees, BDYN is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDYN or FWD?

BDYN is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDYN or FWD?

BDYN has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between BDYN and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDYN and 0.65% for FWD.