BDVL vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. BDVL is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. BDVL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

BDVL vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BDVL

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: 4.83%
• YTD: 5.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVL vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	-0.18%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

BDVL vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDVL	PJBF
Technology	27.7%	40.0%
Financial Services	15.4%	2.5%
Industrials	12.7%	16.5%
Healthcare	10.8%	11.5%
Communication Services	9.1%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	2.3%
Utilities	5.0%	2.0%
Energy	2.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

BDVL vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

BDVL vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVL drawdown since its inception was -7.71%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVL and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDVL	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.71%	0.00%	-7.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	0.00%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	0.00%	-1.14%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BDVL	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.48%	0.00%	+9.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.48%	0.00%	+9.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.48%	0.00%	+9.48%

BDVL vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDVL vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

BDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BDVL iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF	3.52%	2.79%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, BDVL or PJBF?

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDVL or PJBF?

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for PJBF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDVL or PJBF?

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between BDVL and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BDVL and 0.59% for PJBF.