PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDVG vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BDVG vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BDVG vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BDVG
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
2.25%13.81%11.75%3.25%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.30%11.90%14.16%3.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.30% return.


BDVG

1D
1.08%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
2.25%
6M
3.26%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDV

1D
0.24%
1M
-2.54%
YTD
12.30%
6M
12.67%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
13.97%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDVG vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BDVG vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVG
BDVG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVG vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDVGHDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

1.24

-0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.70

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.65

-0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.84

6.01

-0.17

BDVG vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDVG Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDVG and HDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDVGHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.24

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.73

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BDVG and HDV is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BDVG vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than HDV's 2.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDVG
iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF
1.67%1.75%1.69%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.92%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%

Drawdowns

BDVG vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and HDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BDVGHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.46%

-37.04%

+22.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.75%

-10.04%

-1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.92%

-2.58%

-2.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-3.09%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

2.88%

-0.40%

Volatility

BDVG vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) has a higher volatility of 3.48% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 2.94%. This indicates that BDVG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BDVGHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

2.94%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

7.06%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.70%

12.79%

+1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.99%

12.78%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.99%

15.70%

-3.71%