BDVG vs. EMDV

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BDVG (iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDVG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by iMGP, while EMDV is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. BDVG is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. Over the past year, BDVG returned 24.96% vs 9.73% for EMDV. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BDVG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

BDVG vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 2.78% return.

BDVG

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 6.53%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 6M: 13.91%
• 1Y: 24.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMDV

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 9.73%
• 3Y*: 3.31%
• 5Y*: -2.68%
• 10Y*: 2.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BDVG vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF	13.16%	13.81%	11.75%	3.25%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.78%	11.90%	0.06%	-4.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BDVG and EMDV is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2023	0.41

BDVG vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BDVG	EMDV
Industrials	18.6%	6.2%
Technology	18.2%	22.5%
Financial Services	17.0%	24.1%
Consumer Defensive	11.6%	16.4%
Energy	10.5%	-
Healthcare	9.8%	8.2%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	6.2%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.9%
Utilities	3.1%	8.3%
Real Estate	1.3%	-
Communication Services	0.6%	6.2%

Return for Risk

BDVG vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDVG

BDVG Risk / Return Rank: 76
BDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 26
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDVG vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BDVG	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	0.88	+1.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.64	1.31	+2.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.17	+0.29
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	1.37	+2.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.77	4.20	+10.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BDVG vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDVG Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDVG and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BDVG	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	0.88	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	0.23	+1.00

Drawdowns

BDVG vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BDVG	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.46%	-39.20%	+24.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-7.24%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.71%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-13.44%	+13.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.35%	-13.55%	+11.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	2.37%	-0.63%

Volatility

BDVG vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is 3.30%, while ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that BDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BDVG	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.95%	-0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.52%	9.07%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.96%	11.10%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.96%	15.40%	-3.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.96%	18.26%	-6.30%

BDVG vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BDVG vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than EMDV's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF	1.51%	1.75%	1.69%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	2.37%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BDVG and EMDV in my portfolio?

BDVG and EMDV have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BDVG or EMDV?

EMDV has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to BDVG (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDVG dropped -14.46% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

Which ETF is better, BDVG or EMDV?

On 1-year performance, BDVG leads with 24.96% vs 9.73% for EMDV. On fees, BDVG is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BDVG has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BDVG or EMDV?

Over the 1-year period, BDVG has performed better with a 24.96% return vs 9.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BDVG or EMDV?

BDVG is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BDVG or EMDV?

EMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.51% for BDVG.

What is the main difference between BDVG and EMDV?

BDVG is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while EMDV is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: iMGP and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for BDVG and 0.60% for EMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.