BDVG vs. EMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV).
BDVG and EMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDVG is an actively managed fund by iMGP. It was launched on Jun 29, 2023. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016.
Performance
BDVG vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDVG vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 2.25% | 13.81% | 11.75% | 3.25% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | -1.92% | 11.90% | 0.06% | -4.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDVG achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's -1.92% return.
BDVG
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -4.72%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 13.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMDV
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -1.92%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 8.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.42%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- 2.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDVG vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDVG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BDVG vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank
BDVG
EMDV
BDVG vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDVG | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.71 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.05 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.12 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | 3.72 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDVG | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.71 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.20 | +0.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between BDVG and EMDV is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BDVG vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison
BDVG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than EMDV's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDVG iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF | 1.67% | 1.75% | 1.69% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
BDVG vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDVG drawdown since its inception was -14.46%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDVG and EMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDVG | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -39.20% | +24.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.75% | -7.48% | -4.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.92% | -17.40% | +12.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | -13.52% | +11.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 2.24% | +0.24% |
Volatility
BDVG vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iMGP Berkshire Dividend Growth ETF (BDVG) is 3.48%, while ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that BDVG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDVG | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.48% | 5.42% | -1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 8.29% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 11.95% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 15.39% | -3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.99% | 18.28% | -6.29% |