BDRY vs. CCOM
BDRY (Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF) and CCOM (Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. BDRY is passively managed, while CCOM is actively managed. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BDRY charges 3.76%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CCOM.
Performance
BDRY vs. CCOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BDRY
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- 6M
- 16.39%
- YTD
- 53.02%
- 1Y
- 79.89%
- 3Y*
- 39.44%
- 5Y*
- -12.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -7.35%
CCOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -3.35%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $397.41K | $463.93K | $806.29K | |
| $529.10 | $1.63K | $5.18K |
BDRY vs. CCOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 22.22% |
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | -3.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDRY and CCOM is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDRY vs. CCOM — Risk / Return Rank
BDRY
CCOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDRY vs. CCOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF (BDRY) and Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (CCOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDRY | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDRY vs. CCOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDRY drawdown since its inception was -89.16%, which is greater than CCOM's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDRY and CCOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDRY | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.16% | -7.44% | -81.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.67% | -5.61% | -62.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.58% | -3.33% | -55.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.92% | — | — |
Volatility
BDRY vs. CCOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDRY | CCOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.11% | 12.53% | +27.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.80% | 12.53% | +47.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.13% | 12.53% | +49.60% |
BDRY vs. CCOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDRY has a 3.76% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOM's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDRY vs. CCOM - Dividend Comparison
BDRY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BDRY Breakwave Dry Bulk Shipping ETF | 0.00% |
CCOM Simplify Chinese Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDRY and CCOM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CCOM is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CCOM is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.76% for BDRY.
CCOM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.00% for BDRY.
They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 3.76% for BDRY and 0.99% for CCOM.
Find the right allocation for BDRY and CCOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer