PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BDIV vs. VLUE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BDIV vs. VLUE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BDIV vs. VLUE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
-0.19%18.59%3.14%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
4.44%32.67%-0.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than VLUE's 4.44% return.


BDIV

1D
1.54%
1M
-5.31%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
1.34%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VLUE

1D
2.68%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
4.44%
6M
14.88%
1Y
36.35%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
9.45%
10Y*
11.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BDIV vs. VLUE - Expense Ratio Comparison

BDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VLUE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BDIV vs. VLUE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BDIV
BDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VLUE
VLUE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VLUE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VLUE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VLUE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VLUE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VLUE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BDIV vs. VLUE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BDIVVLUEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.18

1.87

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

2.52

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.36

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

2.92

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.35

12.74

-4.39

BDIV vs. VLUE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the VLUE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BDIV and VLUE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BDIVVLUEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

1.87

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.61

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between BDIV and VLUE is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BDIV vs. VLUE - Dividend Comparison

BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than VLUE's 2.00% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDIV
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF
1.14%1.14%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VLUE
iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
2.00%2.11%2.73%2.66%3.18%2.22%2.42%2.61%2.70%2.14%2.07%2.39%

Drawdowns

BDIV vs. VLUE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, smaller than the maximum VLUE drawdown of -39.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and VLUE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BDIVVLUEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.98%

-39.47%

+24.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.26%

-12.81%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.58%

-6.60%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-6.08%

+4.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.94%

-0.74%

Volatility

BDIV vs. VLUE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) is 3.86%, while iShares Edge MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that BDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLUE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BDIVVLUEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

6.26%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.29%

12.28%

-4.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

19.55%

-4.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.71%

17.35%

-3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.71%

19.61%

-5.90%