BDIV vs. KWIN
BDIV (AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. BDIV is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDIV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.
Performance
BDIV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDIV achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 2.05% return.
BDIV
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 20.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.95%
KWIN
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.95K | $59.67K | $64.41K | |
| $349.84K | $511.88K | $448.46K |
BDIV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF | 10.04% | 1.60% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 2.05% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDIV and KWIN is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDIV vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank
BDIV
KWIN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BDIV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF (BDIV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDIV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDIV vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDIV drawdown since its inception was -14.98%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDIV and KWIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDIV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.98% | -1.58% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -1.00% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.87% | -0.33% | -1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
BDIV vs. KWIN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDIV | KWIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 4.04% | +5.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 4.04% | +9.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 4.04% | +9.02% |
BDIV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDIV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDIV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison
BDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BDIV AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF | 1.55% | 1.14% | 0.62% |
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDIV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDIV is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDIV is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.
BDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.
They also come from different issuers: AAM and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for BDIV and 0.51% for KWIN.
Find the right allocation for BDIV and KWIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer