BDGS vs. BUFX
BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BDGS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bridges, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BDGS charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
BDGS vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDGS achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.10% return.
BDGS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 13.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 4.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BDGS vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 5.64% | 6.66% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.10% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDGS and BUFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDGS vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
BDGS
BUFX
BDGS vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDGS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.47 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDGS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.76 | 2.68 | -0.92 |
Drawdowns
BDGS vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDGS drawdown since its inception was -9.12%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDGS and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDGS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.12% | -2.87% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.07% | -0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.64% | -0.24% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | — | — |
Volatility
BDGS vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDGS | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.08% | 3.98% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 3.98% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.21% | 3.98% | +4.23% |
BDGS vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDGS has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDGS vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDGS and BUFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
BDGS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bridges and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for BDGS and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for BDGS and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer