BDCX vs. PFFL
BDCX (ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN) and PFFL (ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BDCX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while PFFL is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BDCX returned 2.22%/yr vs -7.13%/yr for PFFL. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BDCX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PFFL.
Performance
BDCX vs. PFFL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly lower than PFFL's -3.79% return.
BDCX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- 6M
- -9.86%
- YTD
- -10.75%
- 1Y
- -18.23%
- 3Y*
- 0.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.61%
PFFL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- 6M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- -1.99%
- 3Y*
- 2.35%
- 5Y*
- -7.13%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.67K | $35.86K | $42.25K | |
| $16.66K | $15.21K | $17.72K |
BDCX vs. PFFL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | -10.75% | -10.42% | 15.32% | 35.33% | -17.67% | 52.70% | 25.40% |
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN | -3.79% | 2.18% | 4.77% | 8.65% | -39.15% | 7.52% | 20.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and PFFL is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDCX vs. PFFL — Risk / Return Rank
BDCX
PFFL
BDCX vs. PFFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BDCX | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.99 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.21 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | -0.42 | -0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. PFFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum PFFL drawdown of -80.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and PFFL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDCX | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.96% | -80.68% | +45.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.35% | -11.92% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.39% | -23.75% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.96% | -48.51% | +13.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.46% | -40.73% | +13.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -28.75% | +18.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.28% | 6.05% | +9.23% |
Volatility
BDCX vs. PFFL - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN (PFFL) at 4.44%. This indicates that BDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BDCX | PFFL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 4.44% | +2.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.67% | 11.28% | +11.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.36% | 15.65% | +12.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 23.73% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.87% | 54.81% | -27.94% |
BDCX vs. PFFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
BDCX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BDCX vs. PFFL - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.64%, more than PFFL's 12.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 21.64% | 19.17% | 15.28% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFL ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged Preferred Stock ETN | 12.79% | 13.27% | 13.76% | 13.71% | 13.90% | 8.82% | 9.75% | 11.21% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BDCX and PFFL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BDCX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to PFFL (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BDCX dropped -34.96% vs PFFL's -80.68%.
On 5-year performance, BDCX leads with 2.22% vs -7.13% for PFFL. On fees, PFFL is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, PFFL has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BDCX has performed better with a 2.22% return vs -7.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFL is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BDCX.
BDCX has the higher dividend yield at 21.64%, compared with 12.79% for PFFL.
BDCX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PFFL is Leveraged Bonds. BDCX tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%), while PFFL tracks Solactive Preferred Stock ETF Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BDCX and 0.85% for PFFL.
PFFL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BDCX and PFFL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer