BDCX vs. MLPR
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR).
BDCX and MLPR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BDCX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Business Development Companies (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. MLPR is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index (150%). It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. Both BDCX and MLPR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDCX or MLPR.
Key characteristics
| BDCX | MLPR | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.20% | 21.14% |
| 1Y Return | 39.58% | 52.87% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.36% | 37.86% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.40 | 2.87 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.22% | 18.90% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.96% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BDCX and MLPR is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BDCX vs. MLPR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BDCX achieves a 10.20% return, which is significantly lower than MLPR's 21.14% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BDCX vs. MLPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BDCX and MLPR have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDCX vs. MLPR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) and ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDCX vs. MLPR - Dividend Comparison
BDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.60%, more than MLPR's 9.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDCX ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN | 14.60% | 14.71% | 17.47% | 11.52% | 6.32% |
MLPR ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN | 9.23% | 10.08% | 10.07% | 10.69% | 4.21% |
Drawdowns
BDCX vs. MLPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDCX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum MLPR drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDCX and MLPR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDCX vs. MLPR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5X Leveraged MVIS BDC Index ETN (BDCX) is 3.91%, while ETRACS Quarterly Pay 1.5x Leveraged Alerian MLP Index ETN (MLPR) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that BDCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.